Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

A Long Island family's nightmare: Newborn nearly bleeds to death after circumcision in NICU

A disturbing incident recently came to light in Long Island, New York, where a baby boy, Cole Groth, was subjected to catastrophic medical complications following what is typically a routine circumcision. Born on March 31 with congenital heart disease, Cole was initially anticipated to be discharged after undergoing a successful heart procedure. However, a decision to proceed with circumcision led to grave consequences for the newborn, who bled profusely for over ten hours following the procedure, resulting in severe organ damage, including liver and kidney complications. Tim and Gabrielle Groth, Cole's parents, stated they were not informed of the elevated risks associated with circumcision for infants with congenital heart defects, which contributed to their decision to go ahead with the procedure. The emotional intensity of their experience is palpable as they recount discovering their son in a critical state—pale and lethargic, representing a stark contrast to the healthy baby they had just held prior to the hospital visit. Eyewitness accounts from Tim Groth depict a healthcare system that failed to respond adequately during multiple critical hours. Following the circumcision, hospital staff reportedly did not promptly address the alarming symptoms, which included excessive bleeding that went unrecognized until significant damage had already occurred. This negligence raises ethical questions about patient care protocols, especially in a specialized unit like a cardiac NICU. The couple's heartbreaking journey has garnered community support, resulting in a GoFundMe campaign that aims to raise awareness of potential surgical risks and advocate for systemic changes in pediatric care. The Groths aim not only for their son's recovery but also for improvements in how medical teams communicate risks to parents, especially in vulnerable patients. In their viral social media posts, Tim Groth describes the ordeal as one from a nightmare, expressing anger over the system that allows such preventable mistakes to threaten lives. The situation has prompted discussions about surgical risks, particularly circumcision, which, while seen as a common practice, carries inherent dangers that can escalate even in seemingly healthy infants. These tragic outcomes like Cole's exemplify the critical need for informed consent practices that consider a patient’s unique health background, particularly in a setting involving neonatal surgeries. As the community rallies behind the Groths, their story serves as a cautionary tale, highlighting the importance of vigilance and accountability within the medical system, especially concerning procedures performed on the most vulnerable patients, such as newborns. In summary, the Groth family's experience shines a light on the sometimes-overlooked risks in pediatric medicine, stressing a need for transparent communication from healthcare professionals and an emphasis on tailored patient care that considers specific health conditions. The emotional and physical toll on the family, as captured in their pleas for awareness and justice, indicates that there may be long-lasting effects on their lives as they navigate a challenging path ahead for their son.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
30/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from   21   different sources.
Bias Assessment: The news report presents a personal and emotional story with clear advocacy aims, focusing on the parents' perspective and their emotional turmoil. While it truthfully recounts the dangerous situation involving the circumcision and its aftermath, the language evokes significant sympathy and outrage, which could promote a biased view against the medical institution involved. However, it also provides factual details about the circumstances and acknowledges the risks associated with such procedures. Hence, the bias score reflects a moderate level of subjectivity, primarily driven by the family's narratives and appeal for change.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: