Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

A day on Uranus is about half a minute longer than previously thought, according to new research.

Recent research published in Nature Astronomy has provided a revised estimate of the length of a day on Uranus, revealing that it lasts 17 hours, 14 minutes, and 52 seconds—28 seconds longer than the previous estimate made by NASA’s Voyager 2 spacecraft in 1986. This conclusion arose from a detailed analysis of 11 years of data collected by the Hubble Space Telescope, focusing on the planet's auroras and magnetic field. The improved precision in measuring Uranus' rotational period is vital for the scientific community as it allows for more accurate coordination when planning future missions to the planet, including potential atmospheric entry site selections for upcoming exploratory missions. Previously, the uncertainty surrounding Uranus' rotation had posed challenges, particularly distinguishing its magnetic axis. Laurent Lamy, the lead author of the study, highlighted the importance of the long-term data, marking the study as a resolution to a longstanding issue in planetary science. With a newfound capability to rely on a refined coordinate system, astronomers can now make more accurate comparisons between auroral observations extending over nearly 40 years. The methodology employed in this research underlines the significance of continuous astronomical observations and opens up new opportunities for understanding not just Uranus, but potentially similar exoplanets as well.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
20/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from  19  different sources.
Bias Assessment: The article presents the information in a factual and scientific manner, primarily focusing on the findings of the research without incorporating emotionally charged language or biased judgments. However, it does reference previous estimates made by Voyager 2 to contextualize the discovery, which might lead to a slight perceived bias towards favoring the new research over past findings. Overall, the presentation remains objective and informative.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: