Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

2025 NFL Draft Recap: Cleveland Browns' Surprising Moves and Shedeur Sanders' Fall

The 2025 NFL Draft has concluded, unveiling a rollercoaster of surprises and strategic moves. Among the most discussed narrative is the Cleveland Browns' decision-making, which seemed to take a rather peculiar turn throughout the draft process. The Browns were involved in a significant early trade with the Jacksonville Jaguars, enabling Jacksonville to select the highly touted Travis Hunter with the second overall pick. This transaction is reflective of the transformative strategies that teams undertook to bolster their rosters. Another focal point of this draft was the unexpected slide of quarterback Shedeur Sanders, who ultimately was selected by the Browns in the fifth round at pick 144. Despite strong college performances, including a completion rate of 74% in his final year, Sanders' reputation took a hit due to perceived off-field distractions and questions about his fit in the NFL. His selection came after the Browns had chosen another quarterback, Dillon Gabriel, in the third round, leaving many puzzled by the team's overall strategy. The rationale provided by Browns' GM Andrew Berry, indicating that drafting Sanders was not planned but rather a unique opportunity that arose during the draft, raises eyebrows regarding the team’s foresight and cohesive strategy. Many observers noted that fans might be skeptical about whether the team knows what it’s doing, given that fans are already questioning the transparency of the Browns’ leadership over their reactions toward Sanders during the selection process. Sanders himself has expressed gratitude for the opportunity and is focused on proving skeptics wrong, despite acknowledging the financial implications of falling out of the early rounds. Viewing the QB room dynamics, he is positioned alongside veterans Joe Flacco and Kenny Pickett, and the pressure is significantly heightened given the lack of a definitive starter after Deshaun Watson's injury issues. This draft was also significant from a comparative team analysis standpoint. For instance, the Jaguars’ management, particularly in their approach to acquiring generational talent like Hunter, drew high marks, while the Browns' unconventional dual quarterback selection strategy has invited criticism. In contrast, Sanders' tumultuous journey has drawn a wide variety of perspectives, with contrasting views about whether the Browns could establish a nurturing environment for him. Additionally, other notable narratives emerged from the draft, including the San Francisco 49ers’ full defense-focused strategy and the Titans’ efforts to surround their newly drafted quarterback Cam Ward with an arsenal of weapons. Teams like the Ravens making choices on kickers, and late-round picks from big organizations also shaped the draft coverage. In the grand scheme, the 2025 NFL Draft emphasized the complexities and unpredictability of team-building in the league. As teams like the Jaguars seem poised to strengthen their playoff prospects, questions loom large over Cleveland's direction and whether they will fulfill Sanders' potential as a QB or further complicate their troubled quarterback situation. The peculiarities of this draft cycle symbolize the ongoing evolution of strategies within the NFL, making it an essential spectacle for fans and analysts alike, who scrutinize both the moves made and the narratives crafted around those choices.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
65/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from   18   different sources.
Bias Assessment: The coverage exhibits a moderate level of bias, particularly in its focus on the negative aspects surrounding Shedeur Sanders' fall in the draft and the Browns' questionable draft strategies. The language used tends to highlight failures and present a critical lens towards certain teams, emphasizing discrepancies while minimizing the successes or potential positives. However, it provides some balance by discussing achievements of other teams, thus scoring a 65 on the bias scale.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: